Research Library  ·  Buyer’s Guides

Where to buy CJC-1295.

A 2026 sourcing guide for CJC-1295 — the GHRH analog with two distinct variants (DAC and no-DAC), a discontinued clinical development program, a WADA prohibition that funded its own analytical-chemistry literature, and the specific identity-verification questions every research buyer should ask before purchase.

WTBP Research Team Last reviewed May 2026 8 min read Buyer’s Guides

You can buy CJC-1295 from research-supply vendors online. That's the only route: it isn't approved anywhere, and it sits on the FDA's list of substances pharmacies may not compound. Two different molecules are sold under the name, so the vendor question matters more here than almost anywhere else.

CJC-1295

Referenced in this guide
Batch-matched COAHPLC + mass specResearch use only

The CJC-1295 referenced throughout this article, supplied as a research compound with a certificate of analysis matched to the lot you receive — the check this site argues you should hold any supplier to.

Shop CJC-1295

CJC-1295 mimics the body's growth-hormone-releasing hormone, and research-supply vendors are the only source, since the FDA's 503A bulks list closed compounding. Two different molecules circulate under the identical name. No-DAC delivers a 30-minute window, while DAC adds a linker that binds blood albumin and extends it to 6–8 days. Expect $50–$150 per 5 mg; WADA prohibits both.

Quick answer: Pay $50–$150 per vial. Confirm the label says “no-DAC” or “DAC” explicitly. Demand a Certificate of Analysis from an ISO 17025 lab, the international testing-quality standard, with HPLC purity above 98% and a mass-spec result matching the variant. For no-DAC, that's 3367.9 g/mol.

Where can you buy CJC-1295?

CJC-1295 has exactly one open buying channel: research-supply vendors online, selling it as a research reference compound with no prescription. The retail-pharmacy and compounding routes are both closed, and the reasons are worth knowing.

We'd read that middle row as the important one. A compound named on the FDA's not-eligible list has been looked at and set aside, which is a different position from simply never being reviewed.

Six vendors, all checked on 13 August 2026 against what each will show you before you pay: a third-party certificate you can open, and whether the testing lab is named in the vendor's own copy or only inside the PDF. We did not verify CJC-1295 prices, so there is no price column here — pricing across these same vendors is benchmarked on BPC-157 in our full vendor comparison, where the spread runs $6.30–$12.45 per mg. Stock varies by compound, so check each catalogue for CJC-1295.

Vendor COA Lab named Ships free at
Sports Technology Labs Third-party, published Site and document (MZ Biolabs, Colmaric) $149
Swiss Chems Third-party, published Site FAQ (Janoshik) $100
Core Peptides Third-party, published (A2LA #6377.01.01) Document only (Vanguard Laboratory) $200
PS Peptides Third-party, published Document only (North American Diagnostics) $200
Red Rock Peptides Claimed, none published Not named Not offered

Three caveats travel with that table. Peptriva and Red Rock sell 10 mg vials only, so their per-milligram figures in the BPC-157 benchmark are not comparable with a 5 mg row. Swiss Chems sells its BPC-157 as the arginine salt rather than the plain peptide, so it is not a like-for-like product. And Red Rock publishes no certificate of analysis at all, despite advertising verified COAs. Where To Buy Peptides earns a commission on purchases made through its links, Peptriva included — see our disclosure.

The identity check specific to CJC-1295: CAS 863288-34-0 is the no-DAC registration, and because the name alone settles nothing, make the vendor state which variant the vial holds — DAC, with a 6–8 day half-life, or no-DAC at roughly 30 minutes.

What is CJC-1295, and why are there two of them?

CJC-1295 is a synthetic copy of the first 29 amino acids of human growth-hormone-releasing hormone, the brain signal that triggers GH pulses. ConjuChem developed it in the early 2000s as a once-weekly drug candidate, as Rahman and colleagues recount.

It activates the GH pathway in the pituitary. It doesn't bind the ghrelin pathway, which is ipamorelin's job. That's why researchers stack the two rather than choose one.

The thing that decides which CJC-1295 you have is the DAC group. DAC stands for Drug Affinity Complex, a small chemical linker that bonds to albumin in blood.

Albumin acts like a slow-release shuttle. Once the peptide is bound to it, the kidneys can't filter it out fast, as Memdouh and colleagues describe.

What should you check before buying CJC-1295?

Check four things on a CJC-1295 vial. The label must name DAC or no-DAC. The mass-spec figure must match that variant. The seller must make no clinical claims, and it must ship as powder rather than pre-mixed liquid. The general eight peptide-buyer criteria apply on top.

1. The label must say DAC or no-DAC

Naming the variant is the single most important CJC-1295 check. The vial and the CoA both have to tell you which one you bought. No-DAC has CAS number 863288-34-0, and DAC has a separate CAS registration.

A vendor selling “CJC-1295” without disambiguating is failing the most basic identity disclosure. Walk away.

2. The discontinuation history matters

ConjuChem halted CJC-1295 DAC clinical development around 2007. Public reporting attributes the decision in part to broader scrutiny of ConjuChem's DAC pipeline, after a fatal adverse event in a separate trial of CJC-1131, a different DAC-modified peptide.

We found no sign the program was ever revived, and CJC-1295 has no current pharmaceutical sponsor. A vendor making clinical claims about treating GH deficiency or reversing aging is in FDA enforcement territory.

3. Mass-spec must match the variant

For no-DAC, the theoretical mass is 3367.9 g/mol. The formula is C152H252N44O42.

Peptides this big usually show up in mass-spec as multi-charge ions: observed [M+2H]2+ near 1684.9, or [M+3H]3+ near 1123.6. The calculated neutral mass should land at 3367.9 within standard tolerance.

The DAC variant has a different molecular weight because the linker adds mass. A CoA reporting 3367.9 for a vial labeled DAC is internally inconsistent. Don't buy from that vendor.

4. Storage and shipping are unforgiving

CJC-1295 ships lyophilized and stores at −20°C long-term. Once you reconstitute it, the no-DAC form has a usable window of about 30 days refrigerated at 2–8°C. That's shorter than BPC-157, because CJC-1295 degrades faster in solution.

Vendors who sell pre-mixed liquid at room temperature are selling a product with a shelf life measured in days. The powder is what ships reliably.

Where this falls short: We find the published CJC-1295 evidence thinner than vendors imply. Recent PubMed literature is dominated by anti-doping detection methods, not efficacy trials. The DAC clinical program halted in 2007 and never produced a Phase III readout.

A small 2026 mouse-model paper covers the CJC-1295 and ipamorelin stack in glucocorticoid-induced muscle loss, but no controlled human study has confirmed it. We’d buy CJC-1295 for what it is: a research GHRH analog with a stalled clinical history and a strong WADA detection profile.

What does CJC-1295 cost in 2026?

CJC-1295 costs $50–$100 for a 5 mg no-DAC vial and $80–$150 for the same size in DAC. It sits mid-curve for research peptides: longer than the 15-residue BPC-157, shorter than 44-residue tesamorelin. The DAC linker adds synthesis cost. Third-party tested retail in 2026:

Below $40 per 5 mg no-DAC, or below $60 per 5 mg DAC, deserves a question. Each coupling step in a 29-amino-acid peptide is a chance for incomplete reaction. That means more impurities at the cheap end, where purification gets shortcut.

Yes. CJC-1295 is legal to buy as a research reference compound. It isn't FDA-approved, never finished clinical development, and lives on the FDA's bulks-not-eligible-for-503A-compounding lists. That closes the compounding channel for human use. It doesn't affect research sales.

Three more things the legal status does:

Research-use sales operate under 21 CFR § 809.10(b)(9). Laboratory research stays legal. See peptides and the 2023 503A categorization for the deeper regulatory context.

Advances in the detection of growth hormone releasing hormone synthetic analogs.

Memdouh et al., Drug Testing and Analysis, 2021

Safety and efficacy of approved and unapproved peptide therapies for musculoskeletal injuries and athletic performance.

Mendias & Awan, Sports Medicine, 2026

What are the red flags when buying CJC-1295?

The biggest CJC-1295 red flag is a vial labeled only “CJC-1295” with no DAC status. Seven warning signs we’d skip:

CJC-1295 (no DAC)

10 mg ≥99% pure Lyophilized

Modified GRF 1-29, CAS 863288-34-0, MW 3367.9 g/mol. The same reference compound used across the 2020–2024 anti-doping detection literature and grouped in the 2026 Sports Medicine review of unapproved peptide therapies. COA with HPLC trace and mass-spec ships with every order.

Learn more

Frequently asked questions

Can a pharmacy sell you CJC-1295?

No. CJC-1295 has no approved product, so a retail pharmacy has nothing to dispense. Compounding pharmacies are blocked separately: the compound sits on the FDA's bulks-not-eligible-for-503A lists. Research-supply vendors selling under Research Use Only labeling are the only route.

Is CJC-1295 legal to buy?

Yes, as a research reference compound. CJC-1295 isn't FDA-approved, never finished clinical development, and sits on the FDA's bulks-not-eligible-for-503A list. That closes compounding pharmacies. It doesn't close research sales. CJC-1295 is also on the WADA Prohibited List under S2.

DAC or no-DAC, which CJC-1295 should you buy?

They're two different molecules. DAC adds an albumin-binding linker that stretches the half-life to 6–8 days. No-DAC, sold as Modified GRF 1-29, has a 30-minute half-life. Most current research use is the no-DAC form, because it preserves pulsatile GH release. If a listing says only “CJC-1295,” ask before you buy.

How much does CJC-1295 cost?

No-DAC CJC-1295 runs $50–$100 for 5 mg and $80–$150 for 10 mg. DAC runs $80–$150 for 5 mg and $130–$220 for 10 mg. The DAC variant costs more because linker conjugation adds synthesis complexity. Below those ranges, purity is the trade-off.

Why was CJC-1295 DAC discontinued?

ConjuChem halted CJC-1295 clinical development around 2007. Public reporting attributes the decision in part to scrutiny of the broader DAC pipeline, after a fatal adverse event in a separate trial of CJC-1131. The program never restarted, and CJC-1295 has no current sponsor.

How does CJC-1295 compare to ipamorelin?

CJC-1295 and ipamorelin act on different signaling pathways with complementary effects. CJC-1295 acts on the GH-releasing pathway. Ipamorelin acts on the ghrelin pathway and also blocks somatostatin, the brake on GH.

Researchers stack them because the two pathways combine well. A 2026 review reported the combination improved muscle force in mouse models of glucocorticoid-induced muscle loss, per Mayfield and colleagues. See the CJC-1295 vs Ipamorelin comparison.

What should a CJC-1295 CoA show?

For no-DAC CJC-1295: CAS 863288-34-0, HPLC purity above 98% with a chromatogram, and mass-spec at MW about 3367.9 g/mol. The mass usually shows as multi-charge ions [M+2H]2+ near 1684.9 or [M+3H]3+ near 1123.6.

Water content should be 2–8% by Karl Fischer titration, and counterion content is usually TFA at 5–15%. The DAC variant has a different MW because of the linker. The lab should be ISO 17025-accredited and named on the report.

What to know now

What we’re watching

The big CJC-1295 signal is whether any developer revives a clinical program. Two decades after the ConjuChem halt, no sponsor has emerged. Without one, efficacy data won't accumulate and the literature stays anchored on analytical chemistry.

A secondary signal is whether the longer-acting GHRH-analog class, which includes tesamorelin, finds any new approved indication beyond HIV-associated lipodystrophy. That would shift the regulatory framing for the whole receptor target. We're also watching FDA enforcement against vendors making clinical claims about CJC-1295.

References

  1. Memdouh, S., Gavrilović, I., Ng, K., Cowan, D., & Abbate, V. (2021). Advances in the detection of growth hormone releasing hormone synthetic analogs. Drug Testing and Analysis, 13(11–12), 1871–1887. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.3183
  2. Rahman, M., Mojica, E. S., Vasireddi, N., et al. (2026). Therapeutic peptides in orthopaedics: Applications, challenges, and future directions. JAAOS: Global Research and Reviews. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00236
  3. Sinha, D. K., Balasubramanian, A., Tatem, A. J., et al. (2020). Beyond the androgen receptor: the role of growth hormone secretagogues in the modern management of body composition in hypogonadal males. Translational Andrology and Urology, 9(Suppl 2), S149–S159. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2019.11.30
  4. Coppieters, G., Deventer, K., Polet, M., Van Eenoo, P., & Judák, P. (2022). An antibody-free, ultrafiltration-based assay for the detection of growth hormone-releasing hormones in urine at low pg/mL concentrations using nanoLC-HRMS/MS. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 214, 114726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2022.114726
  5. Mayfield, C. K., Bolia, I. K., Feingold, C. L., et al. (2026). Injectable peptide therapy: A primer for orthopaedic and sports medicine physicians. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251357593
  6. Mendias, C. L., & Awan, T. M. (2026). Safety and efficacy of approved and unapproved peptide therapies for musculoskeletal injuries and athletic performance. Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-026-02437-0
  7. Coutinho, D., Reis, M., Carvalho, M., et al. (2026). A new era of doping? Use of peptide and peptide-analog drugs in recreational and professional sport and bodybuilding: a critical review. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.26.17773-1
  8. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2023). Section 503A of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/human-drug-compounding/section-503a-federal-food-drug-and-cosmetic-act
  9. World Anti-Doping Agency. (2026). The Prohibited List. https://www.wada-ama.org/en/prohibited-list
  10. International Organization for Standardization. (2017). ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. https://www.iso.org/standard/66912.html

every peptide, every supplier question, one library.